On 6 April 2018, the US Treasury Department’s Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) expanded the list of sanctions
against Russia to include the Russian carmaker GAZ Group.
Initially scheduled for 5 June, the implementation of
sanctions was pushed back to 23 October and eventually,
after negotiations, replaced by a general licence allowing
GAZ Group to continue operations, provided that the
company’s owner Oleg Deripaska (the sanctions against whom
were the reason the company was subject to proceedings in
the first place) leaves the management and separates his
business interests from GAZ Group.
The spring and summer of 2018 were a stressful time for GAZ
Group’s management. It was supposed to achieve the
impossible: find a replacement for Western subcontractors
who supplied parts for almost all the major technical
components of a modern vehicle but could no longer deliver
them to Russia due to sanctions. The management called on
the entire anti-sanctions repertoire to save the company:
legal and diplomatic efforts, smuggling, masking the supply
chain through intermediaries, re-painting and re-coding
components, transferring subcontractors’ production to
Russia, etc.
Resolving the problem by technical means was hopeless; even
if they had successfully concealed all the supply chains,
the question would have remained – how do you ensure
warranty, maintenance and road safety certification for
vehicles made of “unknown components”?
“Import substitution” – referring to
shedding dependence on Western technology – is largely
an illusion
“Import substitution” – a familiar concept in Russia’s
economic vocabulary referring to shedding dependence on
Western technology – is largely an illusion based on the
notion that it is possible to decouple your economy from the
rest of civilisation in the 21st
century. GAZ Group was a great example to illustrate how few
Russian parts there are in a Russian car. Notably, even the
plywood was transported to the factories through the forests
of Northwest Russia from 1,500 km away in Suolahti, Finland.
OFAC’s sanctions would have effectively put the company out
of business.